The sphere is the most important structure to understand in the
opposing universe.

Because,

The universe itself is a sphere.

The galaxies are spheres.

The star systems are spheres.

The stars\planets\moons are spheres.

Electrons, protons, neutrons and the atom itself are also spheres.

All of the fundamental bodies of the universe are spheres.

The sphere is the only structure that combines all the opposing
operations into near perfect harmony:

50% circular + 50% linear.

50% energy + 50% matter.

50% time + 50% distance.

50% motion + 50% rest.

50% push + 50% pull.

50% horizontal plane + 50% vertical plane

This harmony allows the sphere to exist for a very long time.

Within a sphere like our Solar System we can get bodies that are not
in harmony but take an opposing operand to an extreme like a tree for
example. It has a circular trunk but an out of proportion linear
vertical axis. Therefore, it will not exist as long as a body that has
its opposing operands in harmony. Things like asteroids are also
extremes that will not last long but dissolve back to the sphere body
of a planet\star etc.

-Josh.

"jdawe" <mrjdawe*gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c83df008-0274-49b4-ac70-d855bb728700*w27g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> The sphere is the most important structure to understand in the
> opposing universe.
>
> Because,
>
> The universe itself is a sphere.
>
> The galaxies are spheres.

Huh?

Spiral galaxies..
google.co.uk/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=spiral%20galaxy&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi" target="_blank">http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl...-8&sa=N&tab=wi

cylindrical nebula..
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap980427.html

You're confusing a state of minimum gravitational potential energy
with something magical.

On Feb 8, 1:44*am, jdawe <mrjd...*gmail.com> wrote:
> The sphere is the most important structure to understand in the
> opposing universe.
>
> Because,
>
> The universe itself is a sphere.
>
> The galaxies are spheres.
>
> The star systems are spheres.
>
> The stars\planets\moons are spheres.
>
> Electrons, protons, neutrons and the atom itself are also spheres.
>
> All of the fundamental bodies of the universe are spheres.
>
> The sphere is the only structure that combines all the opposing
> operations into near perfect harmony:
>
> 50% circular + 50% linear.
>
> 50% energy + 50% matter.
>
> 50% time + 50% distance.
>
> 50% motion + 50% rest.
>
> 50% push + 50% pull.
>
> 50% horizontal plane + 50% vertical plane
>
> This harmony allows the sphere to exist for a very long time.
>
> Within a sphere like our Solar System we can get bodies that are not
> in harmony but take an opposing operand to an extreme like a tree for
> example. It has a circular trunk but an out of proportion linear
> vertical axis. Therefore, it will not exist as long as a body that has
> its opposing operands in harmony. Things like asteroids are also
> extremes that will not last long but dissolve back to the sphere body
> of a planet\star etc.
>
> -Josh.

jdawe I see the universe shape more like a saddle.(use good science)
The more mass density helps gravity make it rounder. Not all moons or
rock objects are round. Smaller ones like Mars moons are potato
shaped. No perfect spheres exist,and good science tell us the
reason. TreBert

jdawe wrote:
>
> The sphere is the most important structure to understand in the
> opposing universe.
>
> Because,
>
> The universe itself is a sphere.

[snip crap]

Hey stooopid - all 4(pi) steradians from any point within the universe
exactly point to an equidistant Big Bang. Tell us how within a sphere
all points are at its center.

idiot

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm

Empiler wrote:
>
> You're confusing a state of minimum gravitational potential energy
> with something magical.

idiot OP "jdawe" is vastly worse than that. Given a homogeneous
isotropic constant quantity of non-rotating solid mass, shape it so as
to have maximum surface gravitation. The surface of a solid sphere is
not the optimum solution. Maximum gravitation at surface (radius=R,
spherical coords):

Sphere, r(theta) = 2Rcos(theta)
Shmoo, r(theta) = 5^(1/3)Rsqrt[cos(theta)]
(6/5)[(5/8)^(1/3)] = 1.026X larger gravity at origin

idiot OP "jdawe" is not only stooopid, he is "No Child Left Behind"
high school stooopid. The performance bar is set on the floor by the
DoEd. idiot OP "jdawe" found a way under it through the basement.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm

No 'body' will ever last forever in this universe and we can tell when
galaxies, planets, star systems etc are nearing an end when the 50/50
harmony of a sphere begins to fluctuate and it becomes horizontally
wider, vertically smaller etc.


On Feb 9, 2:51*am, Uncle Al <Uncle...*hate.spam.net> wrote:
> Empiler wrote:
>
> > You're confusing a state of minimum gravitational potential energy
> > with something magical.
>
> idiot OP "jdawe" is vastly worse than that. *Given a homogeneous
> isotropic constant quantity of non-rotating solid mass, shape it so as
> to have maximum surface gravitation. *The surface of a solid sphere is
> not the optimum solution. *Maximum gravitation at surface (radius=R,
> spherical coords):
>
> *Sphere, *r(theta) = 2Rcos(theta)
> *Shmoo, * r(theta) = 5^(1/3)Rsqrt[cos(theta)]
> * (6/5)[(5/8)^(1/3)] = 1.026X larger gravity at origin

You are trying to optimise for only one form of matter and only one
force.

The sphere allows for harmony of both forms of matter and both
opposing forces. The sphere allows for harmony of all opposing
operations.

-Josh.

On Feb 8, 5:19*pm, jdawe <mrjd...*gmail.com> wrote:
> No 'body' will ever last forever in this universe and we can tell when
> galaxies, planets, star systems etc are nearing an end when the 50/50
> harmony of a sphere begins to fluctuate and it becomes horizontally
> wider, vertically smaller etc.
>
> On Feb 9, 2:51*am, Uncle Al <Uncle...*hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > Empiler wrote:
>
> > > You're confusing a state of minimum gravitational potential energy
> > > with something magical.
>
> > idiot OP "jdawe" is vastly worse than that. *Given a homogeneous
> > isotropic constant quantity of non-rotating solid mass, shape it so as
> > to have maximum surface gravitation. *The surface of a solid sphere is
> > not the optimum solution. *Maximum gravitation at surface (radius=R,
> > spherical coords):
>
> > *Sphere, *r(theta) = 2Rcos(theta)
> > *Shmoo, * r(theta) = 5^(1/3)Rsqrt[cos(theta)]
> > * (6/5)[(5/8)^(1/3)] = 1.026X larger gravity at origin
>
> You are trying to optimise for only one form of matter and only one
> force.
>
> The sphere allows for harmony of both forms of matter and both
> opposing forces. The sphere allows for harmony of all opposing
> operations.
>
> -Josh.

Light sphere is as Einstein said " a spherical wave."

Mitch Raemsch

Idiot.
Go drool somewhere else.

On Feb 9, 12:19*pm, jdawe <mrjd...*gmail.com> wrote:
> No 'body' will ever last forever in this universe and we can tell when
> galaxies, planets, star systems etc are nearing an end when the 50/50
> harmony of a sphere begins to fluctuate and it becomes horizontally
> wider, vertically smaller etc.
>
> On Feb 9, 2:51*am, Uncle Al <Uncle...*hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > Empiler wrote:
>
> > > You're confusing a state of minimum gravitational potential energy
> > > with something magical.
>
> > idiot OP "jdawe" is vastly worse than that. *Given a homogeneous
> > isotropic constant quantity of non-rotating solid mass, shape it so as
> > to have maximum surface gravitation. *The surface of a solid sphere is
> > not the optimum solution. *Maximum gravitation at surface (radius=R,
> > spherical coords):
>
> > *Sphere, *r(theta) = 2Rcos(theta)
> > *Shmoo, * r(theta) = 5^(1/3)Rsqrt[cos(theta)]
> > * (6/5)[(5/8)^(1/3)] = 1.026X larger gravity at origin
>
> You are trying to optimise for only one form of matter and only one
> force.
>
> The sphere allows for harmony of both forms of matter and both
> opposing forces. The sphere allows for harmony of all opposing
> operations.
>
> -Josh.

I now understand all 'bodies' are spheres.

It does not matter if it is a human, tree, chicken, planet, moon
whatever all bodies start out as close to the 50/50 opposing operation
harmony of a sphere as possible.

A newborn human baby from wikipedia:

"A newborn's shoulders and hips are narrow, the abdomen protrudes
slightly, and the arms and legs are relatively short"

In other words a newborn baby is very close to a perfect sphere.

A new tree starts off from the sphere of a seed.

A new chicken starts off as an egg sphere.

It is at this point when these new 'bodies' are very close to a
perfect sphere that they will have the greatest potential. For a human
body the average age may be 75 years. So, a newborn human baby sphere
will have a potential of 75 years ahead of it. As the sphere deforms
and the opposing operations cease their 50/50 harmony the potential of
those bodies diminishes. A human aged 35 years is quite deformed from
its original sphere so therefore it will only have a potential of
another 40 years left in it.

-Josh.

On Feb 8, 1:44*am, jdawe <mrjd...*gmail.com> wrote:
> The sphere is the most important structure to understand in the
> opposing universe.
>
> Because,
>
> The universe itself is a sphere.
>
> The galaxies are spheres.
>
> The star systems are spheres.
>
> The stars\planets\moons are spheres.
>
> Electrons, protons, neutrons and the atom itself are also spheres.
>
> All of the fundamental bodies of the universe are spheres.
>
> The sphere is the only structure that combines all the opposing
> operations into near perfect harmony:
>
> 50% circular + 50% linear.
>
> 50% energy + 50% matter.
>
> 50% time + 50% distance.
>
> 50% motion + 50% rest.
>
> 50% push + 50% pull.
>
> 50% horizontal plane + 50% vertical plane
>
> This harmony allows the sphere to exist for a very long time.
>
> Within a sphere like our Solar System we can get bodies that are not
> in harmony but take an opposing operand to an extreme like a tree for
> example. It has a circular trunk but an out of proportion linear
> vertical axis. Therefore, it will not exist as long as a body that has
> its opposing operands in harmony. Things like asteroids are also
> extremes that will not last long but dissolve back to the sphere body
> of a planet\star etc.
>
> -Josh.

Josh You are about half right if at all. No perfect spheres. Best youy
look at spuiral galaxies. TreBert

On Feb 25, 10:29*am, bert <herbertglazie...*msn.com> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 1:44*am, jdawe <mrjd...*gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > The sphere is the most important structure to understand in the
> > opposing universe.
>
> > Because,
>
> > The universe itself is a sphere.
>
> > The galaxies are spheres.
>
> > The star systems are spheres.
>
> > The stars\planets\moons are spheres.
>
> > Electrons, protons, neutrons and the atom itself are also spheres.
>
> > All of the fundamental bodies of the universe are spheres.
>
> > The sphere is the only structure that combines all the opposing
> > operations into near perfect harmony:
>
> > 50% circular + 50% linear.
>
> > 50% energy + 50% matter.
>
> > 50% time + 50% distance.
>
> > 50% motion + 50% rest.
>
> > 50% push + 50% pull.
>
> > 50% horizontal plane + 50% vertical plane
>
> > This harmony allows the sphere to exist for a very long time.
>
> > Within a sphere like our Solar System we can get bodies that are not
> > in harmony but take an opposing operand to an extreme like a tree for
> > example. It has a circular trunk but an out of proportion linear
> > vertical axis. Therefore, it will not exist as long as a body that has
> > its opposing operands in harmony. Things like asteroids are also
> > extremes that will not last long but dissolve back to the sphere body
> > of a planet\star etc.
>
> > -Josh.
>
> Josh You are about half right if at all. No perfect spheres. Best youy
> look at spuiral galaxies. TreBert- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Space geometry substance orginating at the center of mass is
spherical.

Mitch Raemsch